Yesterday I discovered that the 20-yard warp I’d spent the last week making was tangled beyond salvation. Ten pounds of yarn and 20-30 working hours, down the drain. And I’ll have to order more yarn to make another go at this.
But am I kicking myself for it? No.
Many of the things I do look really risky from the outside. Putting together an incredibly complicated warp 20 yards long on unfamiliar equipment looks pretty crazy. But it’s not. It’s a calculated risk, and it was (I think) a good decision, even if the result appears to be disaster. Making good decisions about risk does not mean that you never lose. It just means that, on average, the benefits of succeeding outweigh the expected losses from failing.
So why did I take this chance? Because my main concern was whether the warp would tangle during dyeing. The chances of that are basically the same regardless of warp length, so putting on a long warp wasn’t any riskier than putting on a short warp. I could have put on a short, narrow warp as a test, but that would have taken almost as much time as winding and beaming the full warp. (That’s because the bulk of the time investment is in dyeing the warps, which takes about the same length of time regardless of warp length or width.) So about the only thing I’d save by putting on a sample first would be about $150 in yarn. That’s a good bit of money, but it pales against another 20 hours spent winding and dyeing another warp. (I’m assuming my time is worth more than $7.50/hour.)
I mention all this because a lot of weavers are timid about taking risks, and take a “disaster” as a sign that they should take fewer risks. I don’t think that’s a good response. Even a good risk strategy will sometimes produce disaster. And being too cautious also has a cost: the time and materials spent sampling, or the (much higher) creative cost of sticking to the tried and true rather than trying new things. So I would urge you, if you are thinking about risk, to figure out all the costs and benefits involved – not just material cost, but time and creative expression as well.
I do believe in sampling, by the way – and I do a lot of it, because I am usually pushing my limits and samples are worth the effort. But not always. Instead, I calculate my risks – because, in the long run, it saves time, effort, and materials.
Here’s a photo of the failed warp, by the way. It came out beautifully, exactly as I wanted, except for the tangles. I think I understand what happened and how to fix it – so I can’t wait to wind, dye, and beam the next one!
Ian Bowers says
Tien
I understand your approach, and as one who is far from being risk averse, have been through this sort of analysis several times in my (long) life. Try working in health care and making major changes to patient services.
So, the one thing I would add is the corollary that the extent of the risk must be matched by the extent of its management; this should then limit the damage. “What are the risks and how am I going to manage them”.
OK, brilliant hindsight, but tangling and the consequent need to restrain the warp were recognisable risks.
Hopefully next time will be a great success and justify your willingness to take risks.
Tien Chiu says
Hi Ian,
Yes, you are entirely right! I should have mentioned that as well. Also evaluating and addressing worst-case scenarios. Risk management involves all three elements!
Deanna Johnson says
Thank you for this post, Tien! I’m one of those who hesitates to start because often the results don’t match my taste level and expectations, but the risk of not doing anything has a much higher emotional cost.
Laurie says
Thanks for this post. I have been doing dying for first time and I am trying to remember that its has a learning curve and that I need to risk that it may not come out the way I want.
Sharon says
Is it really hopeless or just too slow? You could send it here and let me try untangling.
Tien Chiu says
At this point, really hopeless. Too many broken threads. I wound up shipping the whole thing off to a weaver in New Mexico who is more optimistic than I am. (She may also be able to beam it front to back, but I can’t do that on my jacquard loom as it would require a contortionist.)
Thanks for the offer, though!